Snowshoes rule, cross-country is cumbersome

Your Scribe's new contention about winter activity is that snowshoes are great fun, and cross-country skiing causes undue hassle and pain.
This photo depicts a great spot for winter activity. It is on Cape Cod Hill Road in Franklin County, and in my view . . it is a breathtaking view. Perfect for snowshoeing . .
In my days as an aspiring Yuppie, I got deep into the cross-country ethic. Waxes and klisters; alterations in temperatures and the changing granularity of the snow.
There were excursions in Kennebunk, Freeport, North Conway, you name it. (An aside: The sport did bring Nordic skiers and snowmobilers closer together, for the once-snobby skiers realized that trekking wasn't much fun without a good trail to follow. And the snow machines were built to do just that).
But as I approach my dotage, I find that snowshoes snap on easily and you can be traveling almost immediately. You don't need a great trail to follow, plus it is better exercise.
I rarely fall on snowshoes. But any tumble on Nordic skis these days could provide me with broken bones, which I would like to avoid.
Snowshoes or cross-country skis would be perfect tools with which to enjoy this outdoor setting. But I will take snowshoes, and have a great time trudging about on this scenic white carpet.
E-mail this entry to a friend
As an activity, I prefer xcountry skiing. I have backcountry skis that allow me to trek through some great areas. Often I follow snowshoe tracks.
I do have snowshoes but they are tools for getting up snowy mountains.
No matter what you are strapping to your feet, at least you're getting out in the winter.
Posted by
CarlJanuary 18, 2008 11:46 AM