December 19, 2005
A matter of scale?
First we had the Plum Creek development project to the south and west of Mount Katahdin to deal with. That pot is only now beginning to boil. Stay tuned.
As if that weren't enough to squabble over, there is now, to the east of the majestic mountain, another proposal for a development project, similar in nature (pardon the pun), but on a much smaller scale.
Matt Poulstein has proposed an adventure resort with a lodge and some 58 cabins smack in the shadow of Katahdin. Well-heeled guests will recreate by day in the surrounding "wilderness", and dine and sleep in unheard-of comfort in the evening.
The horror!
Poulstein is a pretty good guy from all accounts. For years he's been associated with the recreation industry in the Katahdin and Kennebec regions through his successful rafting and lodging business, the New England Outdoor Center. He's as savvy a businessman as there is. And he cares about the environment in which he does business.
And I believe him when he says he plans to operate in a sustainable way in an effort to meld with the natural surroundings and preserve traditional uses.
I'm very curious, however, to see what kind of reaction Poulstein's develoment proposal will generate.
Will the enviros loudly cry foul, as they have with the big, bad multinational giant Plum Creek over their Moosehead plan?
Or will they quietly give the nod to a local grassroots guy and allow his development plans to proceed unhindered, without fanfare and ecoterrorism threats?
Poulstein may well succeed. If anybody can pull this off and do it right, it's probably him. And he'll no doubt make it into a good thing for the region.
But I'm still curious...
Does scale make a difference, i.e. Plum Creek vs. Poulstein? What if ten other entrepreneurs wanted to do the same thing? What then? Or is it the robber baron image of Plum Creek that sets people off in foam-mouthed frenzy?
Mr. Kish,
You puzzle me in your editorial. While I respect your opinion, i dont appreciate the bashing on those who have so much concern for the nature of the enviroment (now, pardon my pun). Perosnally, i think the wiolderness resort promotes both outdoor experience and some sort of economic benefit. It may just may be my perception, but I feel you give you writingthe edge of distaste in those who care for the well-being of Maine's environment. Of course I disagree withe ecoterrorism, but I'd like to get a feel of your position on the issue, rather than the other people concerned with each bias, if any opinion is necessary.
Posted by Otis
December 19, 2005 09:50 PM
Yes, size matters.
Posted by BB
December 20, 2005 09:45 AM
Thanks Otis. My take: I deplore hysteria. And it seems more and more that these types of issues become clouded with hysteria. Facts don't matter. Sound bites do. Civility takes a hit. Polarization locks people in their corners. And reasoned discussion by reasonable people becomes nearly impossible. Good people of all stripes have important things to say. Why can't we have these discussions politely and pragmatically from somewhere near the middle, rather than shouting from far on either side?
Posted by
CareyDecember 20, 2005 10:20 AM
Mr. Kish,
In your reply to Otis, you state that you'd like to "..have these discussions from somewhere near the middle, rather that shouting from far on either side." Perhaps you should take your own advice and ensure that future editorials speak more from the middle... it's fairly obvious to me that this one is loudly screaming from one side.
Thanks for kindly associating those who wish to protect the special places in Maine with ecoterrorism.
Posted by
kevinDecember 20, 2005 02:49 PM
Thanks Kevin. You can make that stretch if you'd like to, but you and I both know that's absurd. I want to protect and preserve Maine's north woods as much as you and the next person do. The fact that we approach it from different angles is fine by me. If you think I'm just jim-freakin-dandy with Plum Creek's plan as it is you'd be wrong. But I'm at least willing to see where they want to go with it, as are many other level headed people. But to dismiss them out of hand and cry out that the sky is falling, while refusing to engage them in the process, what good is that? There are a number of environmental groups in this state that have chosen to step into the arena and are working to help shape the process. They are to be applauded. And you can bet that their efforts will yield good results--a better conservation plan, preserved access, more trails, scaled-back development. They see this as an opportunity, not merely a threat. It takes some kind of guts to go out on the edge like they have. I hope they succeed and that when this is all said and done, we have a balanced plan that protects the Moosehead environment and preserves the working forest while enhancing the local economy. Finally, coming full circle, the ecoterrorists operate on the dark fringes of this issue and have no place at the table. I didn't at all mean to lump you and other good people into that shadowy mix. Sorry if you took it that way.
Posted by
CareyDecember 20, 2005 04:29 PM
Post a comment
Blog Index